The purpose of the DARPA Armor challenge is to identify revolutionary and promising new armor systems for military vehicles. The Armor Challenge is aimed primarily at inventors and small organizations who do not have the resources to initiate full-scale armor development programs. The Armor Challenge is an opportunity for developers to obtain a rapid and impartial assessment of their existing armor designs with testing of submitted armor panels in a series of “shoot-outs” at a certified ballistics laboratory.
Participants in the Armor Challenge will be selected by DARPA based on the criteria listed below, and selectees will be invited to send test samples of their novel armor designs for testing at an independent facility. Funding will NOT be provided for Research and Development, but DARPA will reimburse for the cost of manufacturing and shipping of the samples. DARPA will fund all ballistic testing at an independent laboratory to ensure that armor performance is judged consistently by an objective organization operating with recognized, highest standards. Samples that demonstrate superior performance against one or more threats, or that incorporate a particularly innovative design feature, will be considered by DARPA for further development.
TECHNICAL SCOPE
The focus of the Armor Challenge is to identify promising armor systems for military vehicles. There is no requirement to include specific classes of materials in the armor, although it is anticipated that successful systems may be combinations of more than one material type. Passive armor systems are desired. However, non-passive systems operating within the confines of the armor will be considered. “Bullet-on-bullet” or similar techniques that use a projectile or directed energy to defeat a threat beyond the plane of the armor panel are outside the scope of this challenge.
The primary goal for the Armor Challenge is a 50% reduction in weight compared to rolled homogeneous armor (RHA) steel for the following two threats: (1) 7.62mm armor piercing round (specific type to be determined), and (2) 0.50 caliber fragment simulating projectile (FSP). A secondary goal is the feasibility for producing vehicle armor materials at a cost competitive with or less than RHA steel.
Proposers should expect to deliver three (3) eighteen inch (18 in.) by eighteen inch (18 in.) panels for each threat to be addressed. It is acceptable to propose a different panel configuration or weight to address each threat, but armor systems that can provide protection against the range of threats using a single configuration will be evaluated more favorably.
SELECTION PROCESS
The Armor Challenge participants will be selected by DARPA through the following process:
- Submit a concept paper following the guidelines provided in the CONCEPT PAPER REQUIREMENTS” section below.
- Provide an oral presentation (telecon) for clarification of the proposed concept paper, if requested.
- DARPA will accept or decline the proposed armor concept for participation in the Armor Challenge.
- The requested panels for accepted concept papers will be delivered to a testing coordinator (shipping information will be provided when necessary).
- Panels will be tested at a certified ballistics laboratory for up to three threats listed in the “TECHNICAL SCOPE” section above, as soon as it is practicable.
- Ballistic test results will be reviewed by DARPA.
- Recommendations will be made to successful participants for the next steps, including potentially proposing for a DARPA armor development program.
CONCEPT PAPER REQUIREMENTS
Concept papers for the Armor Challenge will be submitted through the link at the bottom of this page. Concept Papers are expected to address the following:
- Projected areal density (in pounds per square foot) required to provide protection against realistic military threat. It is understood that some proposers will not have preliminary ballistic test data available when projecting the performance of their new armor concepts. In those cases, a description of the assumed projectile-defeating mechanism is desired.
- Schedule of delivery and number of the required test panels. Three (3) eighteen inch (18 in.) by eighteen inch (18 in.) panels for each threat are required. The target size requirement can be reduced in exceptional circumstances to twelve inches square if the proposer has no capability for producing larger sizes, however, the number of targets required will increase.
- Total cost for delivered panels (materials, labor, and shipping). The cost summary should be one page and included with the concept paper.
- Potential for producing the proposed armor system in large volumes, its projected production cost, a discussion of the materials sourcing and possible manufacturing options.
CONCEPT PAPER FORMAT
The concept paper must not exceed 8 pages, and must address the issues listed in sections A through D below. Proposers are free to decide the emphasis given to each section, but the focus should be on the technical description of innovative features of the proposed armor design. Only unclassified concept papers will be accepted for the Armor Challenge.
A) Description of the proposed armor concept. This is the centerpiece of the concept papers and should succinctly describe the unique aspects of the armor design. Provide any available test data to support and/or justification for how the proposed armor design will lead to the performance and cost goals.
B) Schedule Proposers are required to indicate the time required to deliver the test articles if their concept paper is selected for inclusion in the Armor Challenge. The Armor Challenges will take place over a one year period. The deliverable for the Armor Challenge will be the submission of no less than three (3) eighteen inch (18 in.) by eighteen inch (18 in.) targets for each threat to be evaluated by DARPA, for a total of six targets.
C) Facilities Description of the facilities that would be used for the proposed effort. Provide enough detail so that reviewers can be confident that proposed armor designs can be delivered to DTI in the time proposed.
D) Cost Total cost for delivered panels (minimum of three per threat), including materials, labor, and shipping. The cost summary should not exceed one page.
Concept papers will be accepted through January 26, 2009.
CONCEPT PAPER EVAULATION CRITERIA
Concept Papers will not be evaluated against each other, since they are not submitted in accordance with a common work statement. The intent is to review concept papers as soon as possible after they arrive. A request may be made for further clarifications. The request for an oral presentation, or lack thereof, should not be construed as either a positive or negative assessment of the concept paper. The Government reserves the right to select all, some, or none of the concept papers received in response to this special notice and to make selections without discussions with offerors.
The following evaluation criteria are listed in order of decreasing importance:
Scientific and Technical Merit of the Concept Paper
Evaluate whether the concept is plausible, innovative and unique, that the technical approach is sound and the materials of construction and methodologies to be utilized are credible, appropriate, sufficient, and are applied rationally.
Value to Defense
Evaluate whether the product is likely to be applicable and useful to the Department of Defense.
Cost Realism
Costs of the purchased panels must be reasonable.
SCHEDULE
Armor Challenge “shoot-outs” will take place periodically throughout the program, and concept papers are required for participation in any single “shoot out.” After the shoot-out, the team's performance will be evaluated in two areas: 1) potential for reducing armor weight as determined by appropriate metrics, and 2) the expected cost of the armor in production quantities. There is no pre-determined number of Armor Challenge participants that will be brought forward into a DARPA development program. There is no guarantee of a DARPA development program arising from this Special Notice, but participants can propose a development program to the DSO Office-Wide BAA06-19.
SECURITY
Due to the possibility that ballistic test data can become classified, proposers must be willing and able to obtain a security clearance if they are selected to continue with a full development program after the Armor Challenge if they do not have a current SECRET security clearance. Security classification guidelines for armor materials have been developed by the Army Research Laboratory (ARL) Weapons and Materials Research Directorate, and these guidelines will be provided to contractors as necessary. Classified test data will be withheld from Armor Challenge participants if they do not hold the appropriate security clearances.
The Armor Challenge may generate information controlled under the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR), 22 CFR 120-130, therefore Armor Challenge selectees may be required to protect information pursuant to ITAR and are encouraged to consider this when proposing.
CONTACT INFORMATION
DARPA Point of Contact:
Dr. Judah Goldwasser
DARPA Program Manager
Defense Sciences Office
Phone: 571.218.4293
Fax: 703.465.1044
E-mail: judah.goldwasser@darpa.mil
CONCEPT PAPER SUBMISSION
To submit an Armor Challenge Concept Paper, create a Microsoft Word or Adobe PDF document that satisfies the above criteria, and attach it an e-mail sent to judah.goldwasser@darpa.mil. |